If you were alive between 2000 and 2015, it’s almost certain that there are photographs of you captured with DigiCams. Many important life moments were recorded on these early digital point-and-shoot cameras. If you were born within a couple years of Y2K, your childhood is likely seen through the lens of a classic DigiCam.
While some complained that the early digital models had poor image quality, there is no doubt that they produced a unique picture aesthetic. With a look that’s different from the film photos before DigiCams, and divergent from the cellphone photos of the last eight to ten years, there is an unmistakable quality to these images. Since so many important life moments—baby pictures, birthday parties, family vacations, anniversary dates, etc.—have this distinct DigiCam character, there has grown a nostalgia towards it. People are now looking at these images with fondness, which has led to an unexpected DigiCam revival.
What is a DigiCam?
DigiCam is simply an early term for any and all digital cameras. It became associated with the lesser expensive models, especially the little pocket point-and-shoot cameras meant for amateurs. Professional and hobby photographers did not embrace the term DigiCam, and instead preferred Digital SLR (and later Mirrorless) for their higher-end gear, and Premium Compact for their smaller cameras. DigiCams are commonly considered early digital cameras that were often inexpensive, small, easy-to-use, and typically meant for snapshots.
The first commercially available digital camera was the Fujifilm FUJIX DS-X, a 0.4-megapixel point-and-shoot released in 1989 that cost a staggering $20,000. While some consider this to be the very first DigiCam, others look at the Apple QuickTake 100, a 0.3-megapixel point-and-shoot released in 1994 that was the first digital camera under $1,000. Still others claim the first was the Canon Powershot 600, which was a 0.57-megapixel point-and-shoot released in 1996 that cost “only” $950. There are a number of other cameras that one might consider the “first” model, but no matter where it all started, DigiCams were niche products that didn’t sell well until the early 2000’s, when everything changed.
Film photography reached its pinnacle in 2001, and then it fell off a cliff, as digital cameras, especially DigiCams, simultaneously became better, cheaper, and often smaller. Consumers quickly embraced the convenience of digital photography. DigiCams became more and more popular, and sales reached their peak in 2010. Thanks to the prevalence of cellphones with built-in cameras, DigiCam sales began to decline, and then fell sharply in 2013. While these cameras were popular from 2000 to 2015, the “golden age”—when everyone it seemed had at least one DigiCam, and the majority of photographs being captured across the world were on DigiCams—was 2006 to 2012. When those in the future look back at photographs from the late-2000’s and early 2010’s, they will likely see many that were shot on inexpensive digital point-and-shoot cameras.
I define Classic DigiCams as those from 2000 through 2015, but I place a special emphasis on those from the golden age (2006 to 2012) when they were most popular. You can actually buy brand-new DigiCams today, and they are still quite similar to those from a decade ago, but I don’t call those “classic” (although you will likely get a similar experience and aesthetic). I would consider DigiCams from the 1990’s and maybe early 2000’s to be Vintage, as things that are 20-years-old or older is commonly considered vintage. On this website I will explore and celebrate Classic DigiCams and the retro-digital photographs that they capture.
What are the best DigiCams?
Best is a subjective term, and what one might consider to be “best” another might not. Iconic brands like Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Minolta, Ricoh, Kodak, and Fujifilm made DigiCams, and recognizable electronic names like Sony, Samsung, and Panasonic made them, too. Some were especially cheap, and some were more expensive. I like different models for various aesthetics and purposes, as they each have aspects that are unique, with different strengths and weaknesses.
There’s a question of whether Premium Compact cameras, such as Ricoh GR, Fujifilm X70, Panasonic LX100, Sony RX100, etc., are Classic DigiCams. I don’t consider them to be because they don’t deliver a Classic DigiCam look. They’re great cameras meant for advanced users—and worth owning—but I believe they’re in a completely different category. If you want the retro aesthetic that DigiCams are known for, those models won’t produce it. With that said, there’s not a strict definition, and where DigiCam ends and Premium Compact begins is certainly a grey area.
I wouldn’t worry so much about getting the absolute “best” Classic DigiCam. What’s more important is finding one that produces the look you want, which might be a common cheap camera, or it might be a rare model that still sells for a lot. What you like could be completely different than what someone else prefers, and it will likely take trying various DigiCams to finally find what is best for you.
Where can I buy a Classic DigiCam?
If you don’t already have an old DigiCam sitting in a box or drawer somewhere collecting dust, you probably know someone who does. You can simply ask friends or family if they own one and if they’d be willing to give it to you. Since these cameras don’t usually hold much value (with some exceptions), they’ll likely happily hand over their electronic relic. Some other options are eBay, Goodwill.com, KEH, B&H, thrift stores, yard sales, and flea markets. While some models do still sell for a lot of money, most are under $100, and many under $50. It’s not uncommon to pay less than $20 for a Classic DigiCam, making these cameras especially excellent for those on a tight budget.
There are a number of things you’ll want to consider before buying a Classic or Vintage DigiCam:
– These cameras were often cheaply made, and not built to last. If the camera you are buying is “untested” there’s a very real chance that it’s actually broken and won’t operate.
– SD Cards weren’t the only (or even yet the standard) digital memory storage devices, especially on older models, and it might be difficult (or more expensive than you were hoping) to obtain the right one, and to find a reader so that you can actually use the pictures. Some of the earliest models even used floppy discs.
– If the camera uses SD Cards, there might be a maximum limit, and the high-capacity SD Cards you already own won’t work. You might find that 2GB, 4GB, or 8GB is the maximum that the camera will accept, depending on the age of the model. Thankfully, 2GB, 4GB, and 8GB SD Cards can still be easily purchased and are cheap. Because DigiCams typically have low or mid resolution sensors, you can capture a lot of images on the card before it fills up.
– While many DigiCams use AA Batteries (consider rechargeable AAs), many others use a special rechargeable battery, which might not come with the camera (be sure to check!) and, if not, might be difficult to find (and possibly expensive). For example, I had to purchase a third-party battery and charger for my Nikon Coolpix S7c, which thankfully was affordable. Sometimes these rechargeable batteries have a special charger, and sometimes they use a certain plug, which might be obsolete and hard to find, for in-camera charging (my Sony CyberShot DSC-WX9 uses a USB cable that I didn’t own).
– While some DigiCams have built-in WiFi, many don’t. If your camera uses SD Cards, you might want an SD Card reader compatible with iPhone or Android to transfer the pictures to your phone.
Should I edit my photos?
You certainly can if you want to—there’s no right or wrong way to do photography—but I would encourage you to not edit your DigiCam pictures. One reason people are drawn to DigiCam photography is for its distinctive character, and if you edit the pictures using software like Lightroom or an app like VSCO, you lose some of that great character, and the aesthetic becomes less DigiCam and more something else. It’s actually quite amazing how “good” or “interesting” (yes, subjective terms) the images look straight-out-of-camera completely unedited, so my recommendation is to accept the pictures for what they are, and celebrate the uniqueness of DigiCam photography.
Authenticity is another aspect of DigiCam photography that people are drawn to. The images are more real—not in the sense that they are the most accurate colors and tones, but in the sense that they are more genuine or intimate moments… less contrived, perhaps. People sometimes consider “Photoshop” to be a bad word, and they can feel as though picture manipulation equals people manipulation. But DigiCam photos bring you right into a slice of time—those wonderfully imperfect and sometimes messy moments where real life happens—without pretense. The serendipity of DigiCam pictures is an important aspect of their charm.
Also, I think that Classic DigiCams can sometimes produce a film-like rendering. Not medium format film, but more like 35mm film from a disposable camera, or perhaps 110 or Disc film. Even though these are digital images, they can sometimes seem less digital—and more analog—than some modern digital cameras.
Shooting with Classic Digicams is about being in the moment, and not expecting perfection. In fact, the imperfections are what give the photos their unique characteristics, and is a part of the aesthetic. Don’t worry if your pictures are “good” or not, because shooting with DigiCams is the antithesis of exceptional image quality, which is an aspect of the experience. Embrace what the cameras are, be in the moment, and enjoy the simplicity of Classic DigiCam photography.
This page contains affiliate links, and if you make a purchase using my links I’ll be compensated a small amount for it.